Skip to content

Epidaurus · Treatment Guide · Mental Health & Addiction

Going abroad for —

Residential Rehab Quality

Addiction rehabilitation facility quality

The country comparison

Which countries are best for residential rehab quality

The destinations ranked high→low under this lens — each with the reasoning behind its score, the cited evidence one click down, and its full report. The verdict is free; the report is the depth.

19 / 19 Countries ranked

Researched and assessed by the Epidaurus editorial pipeline against our published scale. A country below the rule is not yet assessed enough — never ranked last.

  1. 1 United Kingdom GB 4.0/5 Good The United Kingdom operates multiple quality residential rehabilitation facilities with comprehensive evidence-based protocols aligned with NICE guidelines, qualified clinical staff, and exceptionally strong regulator... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 8 cited points
    • Multiple quality facilities with mandatory CQC registration and public inspection reports; Castle Craig holds ISO 9001:2015 for 31 consecutive years with Outstanding 2024 audit rating
    • Comprehensive evidence-based treatment protocols (CBT, DBT, motivational interviewing, trauma-informed care) aligned with NICE guidelines and the Orange Book, with dual-diagnosis capability at ~84 facilities across the UK
    • Qualified clinical staff including consultant psychiatrists, specialist doctors, registered nurses, and addiction counselors accredited through Addiction Professionals UK (NCAC/DAPC); however, addiction counselor title is not statutorily regulated
    • Robust international patient services at premium facilities including Priory Group's dedicated international admissions, VIP airport transfers, and multiple insurance acceptance; Castle Craig TRICARE-approved for US military-affiliated patients
    • Published outcome data: 47% overall treatment completion in England 2023-2024 (58% for alcohol-only); Castle Craig reports 91.8% abstinence or reduced use at follow-up (surveyed patients); rates fall in moderate 40-60% range rather than strong >60%
    • Critical limitation: No internationally recognized CARF or JCI accreditation; CQC and ISO standards are rigorous but less internationally recognized
    • Critical limitation: Limited multilingual clinical staff; most facilities operate exclusively in English, requiring non-English-speaking patients to rely on professional interpreters rather than bilingual clinical teams
    • Identified gap: Peer-reviewed 2024 analysis found aftercare provision to be 'a significant deficiency' in UK residential rehabilitation, particularly concerning for international patients returning home

    Read the full United Kingdom report →

  2. 2 United States US 4.0/5 Good The United States operates one of the world's most extensive residential addiction treatment systems with hundreds of accredited facilities (700-1,260+ holding CARF or Joint Commission accreditation), comprehensive ev... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 8 cited points
    • Approximately 17,561 substance abuse treatment facilities in 2023 with ~24% (4,200+) offering residential care; ~30% accredited by CARF and ~23% by Joint Commission
    • ASAM Criteria is the most widely used and comprehensive standard for placement and treatment of patients with addiction and co-occurring conditions, increasingly incorporated into state Medicaid requirements
    • Substance abuse counselors require at least a bachelor's degree with state-specific licensing; master's degree required for mental health counselors; continuous training requirements
    • 69.1% of mental health facilities provide non-English language services with Spanish in 33.2% of facilities; 11.4% multilingual staff, 48.8% external interpreters, 39.8% both
    • Success rates: 76% sobriety at 3 months, 69% at 6 months, 70% at 9 months for alcohol rehab; 68-71% success rates among women with 6+ month treatment duration
    • High-quality residential treatment centers feature staff-to-patient ratios between 1:3 and 1:10, with premier facilities offering 1:6 ratios with personalized programs
    • US primarily functions as a source country for addiction treatment medical tourism rather than a destination; limited specialized international patient services, visa assistance, or insurance navigation
    • Lack of transparent outcome reporting across sector — most facilities do not publish outcome data; 'treatment looks different for every individual, so there's no standardized way to measure the success of addiction centers'

    Read the full United States report →

  3. 3 Thailand TH 4.0/5 Good Thailand has 4 Ministry of Public Health-licensed facilities plus 1 CARF-accredited center (The Dawn), meeting the Score 4 criterion of 3-4 accredited facilities with evidence-based programs. Leading facilities employ... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • 4 private facilities hold full Ministry of Public Health certification; only The Dawn holds CARF International accreditation (3-year term to January 2027), making it Asia-Pacific's only CARF-accredited private residential rehabilitation center
    • All major facilities implement evidence-based modalities including CBT, DBT, EMDR, ACT, motivational interviewing, and 12-step facilitation; staff hold Master's degrees or higher with international credentials (BABCP, FDAP, HCPC, DClinPsy, CSAT III)
    • Siam Rehab publishes outcome data from 250 international clients (2022-2025): 97% program completion, 82% sobriety at 90 days post-discharge, 9% relapse at 30 days, 18% at 90 days, and Net Promoter Score of +78 using validated instruments (PHQ-9, GAD-7)
    • Robust international patient infrastructure including English-speaking Western-trained staff, Non-Immigrant Medical Treatment (Non-MT) visa facilitation for 60-90 days, facility-covered visa extensions at some centers, and global aftercare referral networks serving 30-50% foreign nationals at leading facilities
    • Regulatory framework through Private Hospital Act B.E. 2541 and Drug Addict Rehabilitation Act B.E. 2545; however, Ministry of Public Health inspections occur periodically rather than continuously, and no central searchable public registry exists to verify licensed vs. unlicensed facilities

    Read the full Thailand report →

  4. 4 Germany DE 4.0/5 Good Germany operates a comprehensive, evidence-based residential addiction rehabilitation system with approximately 320 facilities and strong regulatory oversight through the German Pension Insurance (DRV). Clinical stand... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • Approximately 320 specialized facilities with 13,200+ inpatient beds and ~220,000 patients treated annually, demonstrating substantial scale
    • 68% 12-month abstinence rate in alcohol residential rehabilitation studies, exceeding the 40-60% 'good' range and meeting >60% effectiveness threshold
    • Robust regulatory framework through DRV's mandatory quality assurance program, DEGEMED/FVS+ certification (DIN EN ISO 9001 adapted), deQus addiction-specific certification, and meine-rehabilitation.de public reporting portal
    • Qualified clinical staff: psychotherapists require state Approbation (5+ year postgraduate training); psychiatrists hold medical board certification; dual-diagnosis care available for >50% of patients with comorbid psychiatric conditions
    • Language barrier significantly limits international patient access: psychotherapy is 'almost universally conducted in German,' creating a fundamental clinical compromise for non-German speakers; no large-scale addiction centers built specifically for English-speaking medical tourists

    Read the full Germany report →

  5. 5 Spain ES 4.0/5 Good Spain operates 40+ residential addiction treatment facilities with evidence-based protocols and internationally credentialled clinical staff, exceeding the Score 4 threshold for facility count and program quality. How... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • 40+ private residential facilities purpose-built for international patients, concentrated on Costa del Sol, Ibiza, Mallorca, and Canary Islands
    • Leading facilities employ ICADC/FDAP-credentialled addiction specialists and board-certified psychiatrists with international training; Sea Recovery provides clinical services in 8 languages
    • Evidence-based treatment modalities (CBT, DBT, ACT, MI, 12-Step Facilitation, EMDR, MAT) implemented across major facilities; dual-diagnosis programs explicitly offered
    • No JCI or CARF facility-level accreditation confirmed; facilities hold regional health authority authorizations and WMA accreditation at some centers
    • Claimed success rates 70-90% at select facilities; general evidence base suggests 40-60% for residential treatment completion; systematic national outcome reporting absent

    Read the full Spain report →

  6. 6 United Arab Emirates AE 3.5/5 Moderate The UAE operates two internationally CARF-accredited residential addiction facilities (NRC and Erada) with evidence-based treatment protocols and qualified psychiatrist-led staff trained through international partners... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • Two CARF-accredited facilities with evidence-based programs: NRC (January 2025 accreditation) and Erada (2023, plus Arab Board accreditation March 2025)
    • Qualified psychiatric staff with international training: NRC teams trained with King's College London; Erada Director has 30+ years in addiction psychiatry; Ardens partnerships with Yale-affiliated Silver Hill Hospital and Caron Treatment Centers
    • International patient services explicitly underdeveloped: no dedicated visa facilitation, translated aftercare documentation, or published international patient coordination protocols
    • Severe capacity constraint: only 26 private residential beds available to international patients (17 at Ardens, 9 at Sakina); Erada's 210 beds serve primarily government-linked nationals and men only
    • No published international patient outcomes: outcome data available only for nationals (NRC relapse rate 20% by 2010, 35.7% abstinence in 2024 study); gender segregation limits access for female international patients

    Read the full United Arab Emirates report →

  7. 7 Israel IL 3.5/5 Moderate Israel presents a moderate-to-good residential rehabilitation landscape with a substantial concentration of private facilities (12+) offering evidence-based treatment programs and qualified multilingual staff, domesti... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • Zero JCI or CARF international accreditations; facilities hold only domestic Ministry of Health or Ministry of Social Affairs licenses under Law 5753-1993
    • At least 12 private residential facilities operate alongside 13 public residential detox centers; evidence-based treatment modalities documented include CBT, DBT, 12-step facilitation, somatic experiencing, and animal-assisted therapy across multiple centers
    • Retorno operates dedicated English-language track with native English-speaking clinical staff; Phoenix provides multilingual services (English, Russian, Hebrew); IsraRehab provides Russian-language clinical team and extended online aftercare
    • Clinical staff include psychiatrist-narcologists, PhD psychiatrists, and master's-level psychotherapists; Israeli psychiatrist licensing requires 4-year specialist residency plus formal examination
    • Outcome transparency limited: Retorno reports 60–70% program completion; public sector averages 55% completion of three-week detox programs; no facility publishes independently audited long-term sobriety or relapse-prevention rates

    Read the full Israel report →

  8. 8 India IN 3.5/5 Moderate India has one world-class CARF-accredited facility (Samarpan Recovery, April 2025 — the only such accreditation in Asia) and several nationally accredited facilities offering comprehensive evidence-based treatment (CB... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 6 cited points
    • Samarpan Recovery holds CARF accreditation (only facility with this credential in Asia as of April 2025) and is a Gorski-CENAPS Centre of Clinical Excellence
    • Multiple facilities (Athena Behavioral Health, Sanctum Wellness and Healing) hold NABH national accreditation; no JCI-accredited addiction facilities exist in India
    • Premium facilities employ psychiatrists trained at AIIMS and NIMHANS with RCI-certified clinical psychologists and internationally trained therapists; government IRCA minimum standard is only bachelor's degree plus 6 months experience
    • Approximately 40% of luxury facility patients are from overseas with dedicated international services (airport transfers, English/multilingual staff, NRI family protocols, aftercare continuity)
    • Critical gap: No independently verified outcome data published; Abhasa self-reports 75% success rate without peer verification; Samarpan does not publicly publish aggregate sobriety rates
    • Regulatory environment is weak with estimated 250-300 illegal de-addiction centers in Delhi alone, >50% of inspected facilities unlicensed at time of inspection, and documented cases of physical abuse and forced labor in mainstream sector

    Read the full India report →

  9. 9 Poland PL 3.0/5 Moderate Poland operates a substantial residential addiction rehabilitation sector with evidence-based treatment modalities (CBT, DBT, EMDR, Seeking Safety) and a state-administered staff certification system, but lacks intern... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • Zero JCI/CARF international accreditation across all Polish residential addiction facilities; national CMJ accreditation dissolved January 2024
    • Evidence-based treatment modalities implemented: CBT, DBT, EMDR, Seeking Safety model, 12-step integration; Reversed Addiction Clinic supervised by Harvard-affiliated US expert
    • State-administered certification system through KCPU requiring master's degree, supervised practice, and biannual exams; new 4-year specialization pathway introduced 2023; 10 training units accredited
    • Only 3-4 private facilities (Zeus, Reversed Addiction, The Road Back Home, Terapia Nałęczów) actively serve international patients; Zeus offers 10+ language support; public sector inaccessible to non-Polish speakers
    • No national outcome-tracking system identified; no facility publishes clinical outcome data (sobriety rates, relapse prevention, follow-up results); PATQCN explicitly identifies inadequate quality monitoring as systemic gap

    Read the full Poland report →

  10. 10 Mexico MX 3.0/5 Moderate Mexico offers moderate quality residential addiction rehabilitation with significant variability. Only 2 CARF-accredited facilities (Oceánica, Monte Fénix) serve international patients with evidence-based treatment pr... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • Only 2 internationally CARF-accredited facilities identified: Oceánica and Monte Fénix (Oceánica - December 3, 2025 - https://oceanica-usa.com/)
    • Evidence-based treatment approaches (CBT, DBT, motivational interviewing, 12-step facilitation) implemented at quality facilities (Mexican addiction clinics commonly use Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - residential_rehab_quality.md)
    • Multidisciplinary clinical teams at professional facilities including addiction specialists, psychiatrists, nutritionists, and round-the-clock medical staff (Professional facilities like Oceánica - residential_rehab_quality.md)
    • Bilingual international patient services with English-speaking staff at quality centers managing all logistics from airport pickup to departure (Many rehab centers cater specifically to foreign patients - residential_rehab_quality.md)
    • Outcome data shows ~60% report significant improvements and ~40% maintain long-term abstinence with continuous support, with accredited facilities 20% higher success rates than non-accredited (According to SINAIS data and 2019 report - residential_rehab_quality.md)

    Read the full Mexico report →

  11. 11 Turkey TR 3.0/5 Moderate Turkey operates a dual system with government AMATEM centers and private facilities, but has very limited international accreditation. Only NPISTANBUL Brain Hospital is documented as JCI-accredited with Ministry of He... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 9 cited points
    • Only NPISTANBUL Brain Hospital confirmed as JCI-accredited private facility with Addiction Center licensing from Ministry of Health
    • No CARF (addiction-specific) accreditation identified for any Turkish facilities
    • Treatment approaches include evidence-based modalities (CBT, DBT, medication-assisted treatment with Suboxone) at leading private facilities
    • Nearly 50% of AMATEM inpatients return for additional treatment, indicating concerning relapse/return rates
    • Limited transparency in outcome data; private facilities claim high success rates without published supporting evidence
    • Multidisciplinary clinical teams (psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, nurses) at accredited facilities
    • English-speaking staff available with multilingual support (Arabic, Russian, German, French) for international patients
    • Government Ministry of Health licensing and oversight present for both public AMATEM and private Addiction Centers
    • Research identified gaps in professional licensing, accreditation, and professional standards affecting service quality

    Read the full Turkey report →

  12. 12 Malaysia MY 2.5/5 Moderate Malaysia operates a small but functionally adequate private residential addiction rehabilitation sector with evidence-based treatment modalities and qualified clinical leadership at established facilities such as Sola... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • Zero JCI/CARF accreditation: No residential addiction facility in Malaysia holds international accreditation; Solace Asia holds NAADAC and NAATP credentials, which are below facility-level certification
    • No published outcome data: Malaysian facilities do not publicly report long-term sobriety rates; available studies cite patient satisfaction but lack sustained recovery follow-up
    • Small private sector: Approximately 3-4 quality facilities actively serve international patients, compared to dozens in competing markets like Thailand
    • Evidence-based treatment confirmed: Solace Asia and other facilities implement CBT, DBT, motivational interviewing, EMDR, family therapy, and 12-step integration
    • Recent regulatory framework and systemic failures: Mandatory registration began August 2025 (enforcement untested); March 2026 methamphetamine scandal at government facility indicates oversight gaps

    Read the full Malaysia report →

  13. 13 Japan JP 2.5/5 Moderate Japan operates a domestically robust addiction treatment system with evidence-based clinical approaches, qualified staff, and multiple established facilities, but lacks international accreditation (zero JCI/CARF facil... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • Zero JCI/CARF or equivalent international accreditation identified; private centers require no mandatory accreditation to operate
    • All residential rehabilitation programs operate exclusively in Japanese with no dedicated international patient coordination at public facilities
    • 36.7% perfect abstinence rate at 2 years post-residential treatment and ~40% relapse at 6 months demonstrate moderate outcomes
    • Multiple evidence-based facilities (Kurihama Medical Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Matsuzawa Hospital, DARC network of 80+ sites) with qualified clinical staff for domestic patients
    • Report explicitly states: 'Japan is not a functional destination for residential addiction treatment medical tourism'

    Read the full Japan report →

  14. 14 Singapore SG 2.5/5 Moderate Singapore's residential rehab market is defined by a single high-quality private facility (The Winslow) operating with MOH licensing but no addiction-specific JCI/CARF accreditation, combined with structural barriers ... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • The Winslow is the only MOH-licensed private residential addiction treatment facility in Singapore, with no competitors or treatment choice available to international patients.
    • Zero published outcome data: No Singapore private residential rehab facility reports sobriety rates, relapse prevention metrics, or longitudinal follow-up statistics, failing a core transparency requirement.
    • No addiction-specific accreditation: The Winslow holds MOH licensing but not JCI or CARF addiction-specific accreditation; IMH/NAMS has JCI hospital accreditation but offers only 3-week inpatient care, well below international 30–90+ day residential standards.
    • Mandatory drug-reporting law (Regulation 19) requires treating physicians to notify the CNB Director within seven days if they suspect drug addiction, overriding medical confidentiality and explicitly deterring international patients from seeking treatment in Singapore.
    • Clinical excellence at The Winslow: Evidence-based neurocognitive treatment (EEG neurofeedback, ATT, cognitive remediation, MORE), leadership by Singapore's former National Chief of Addiction Medicine, 16-week continuum model, and comprehensive international patient coordination.

    Read the full Singapore report →

  15. 15 Jordan JO 2.0/5 Poor Jordan operates only three residential addiction treatment facilities with zero international accreditation (JCI, CARF, or HCAC) and no dedicated international patient services. While evidence-based treatment approach... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 6 cited points
    • Zero international accreditation: no JCI, CARF, or HCAC-accredited addiction facilities identified
    • Severe capacity crisis: 14,129 drug possession charges (2021) vs. ~100 voluntary residential treatment placements; facilities at full capacity
    • No international patient services: no dedicated multilingual clinical staff, international coordination, or facilities marketing to foreign patients
    • No published outcome data: zero sobriety rates, success metrics, or transparent reporting from any facility
    • Critical staffing shortages: one psychiatrist per 75,000 citizens with documented brain drain to Gulf states
    • Limited formalized treatment protocols: some evidence-based approaches documented but no published standards-compliance documentation

    Read the full Jordan report →

  16. 16 Colombia CO 2.0/5 Poor Colombia lacks international accreditation (zero JCI/CARF facilities), has a documented staffing crisis with 60% of addiction workers feeling overwhelmed, provides minimal international patient services, and publishes... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • Zero international accreditation: no addiction-specific facility holds JCI or CARF certification despite 429 registered national facilities and 104 residential programs
    • Staffing crisis: 60% of addiction treatment workers report being overwhelmed; only ~900 psychiatrists serve all Colombian mental health infrastructure; 33 of 318 facilities offer dual diagnosis treatment
    • No outcome transparency: no residential facility publishes standardized outcome data; academic literature characterizes outcomes as 'poorly documented'
    • Minimal international patient services: most facilities Spanish-only; no facility identified with dedicated international patient coordination; language barrier compromises intensive therapies
    • Quality private exceptions: Fundación Evoluciona, Genesis Foundation Colombia, and ESE Hospital CARISMA demonstrate evidence-based care, but these are exceptions not representative of sector capacity

    Read the full Colombia report →

  17. 17 Hungary HU 2.0/5 Poor Hungary operates several residential rehabilitation facilities with evidence-based treatment approaches and qualified clinical staff, but presents critical deficiencies for medical tourists. The complete absence of in... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • Zero international accreditation: no JCI or CARF-accredited addiction treatment facilities identified in Hungary
    • No international patient services: all residential facilities operate in Hungarian only with no evidence of multilingual clinical staff or international patient coordination
    • Limited outcome transparency: only one published completion rate (71.95% at Nyírő Gyula); no long-term sobriety rates or post-discharge outcome data available
    • Explicit absence of quality assurance infrastructure despite heavy administrative oversight, according to peer-reviewed research on Hungary's mental health system
    • Deteriorating policy environment: 2025 legislative reforms included constitutional prohibition on narcotics, shutdown of major harm reduction programs, and absence of replacement national drug strategy since 2020

    Read the full Hungary report →

  18. 18 Brazil BR 2.0/5 Poor Brazil's residential addiction rehabilitation sector lacks international accreditation, published outcome data, and adequate international patient services. While a small premium private sector offers clinically credi... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 5 cited points
    • Zero CARF/JCI or equivalent international accreditation: 'No Brazilian residential addiction rehabilitation facility holds CARF or JCI accreditation' and no facility appears in CARF international directory
    • Complete absence of published outcome data: 'No facility in Brazil publishes residential addiction treatment outcomes, sobriety rates, or long-term follow-up data'
    • Inadequate staff qualifications in dominant sector: Therapeutic communities 'predominantly use peer counselors and religious staff rather than licensed clinicians,' per IPEA research
    • Minimal international patient services: 'English-language residential addiction treatment is available only at a small cluster of luxury boutique facilities in Florianópolis; the broader sector operates exclusively in Portuguese'
    • Documented safety and human rights concerns: Therapeutic communities 'widely known...for human rights abuses including physical and psychological violence, forced labor, and religious freedom violations'

    Read the full Brazil report →

  19. 19 South Korea KR 1.0/5 Poor South Korea receives a score of 1 (Very Poor / Unavailable) due to virtually nonexistent quality residential addiction treatment infrastructure. With only 6 rehabilitation centers nationwide and just 2 government-run ... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 7 cited points
    • Only 6 rehabilitation centres in the country, with just 2 run by South Korea's government food and drug safety ministry
    • 13 of 31 designated hospitals for drug addiction treatment treated zero patients, indicating severe systemic dysfunction
    • Only 292 designated beds across 24 treatment institutions (fewer than 13 beds per facility on average)
    • Designated hospitals cite 'lack of medical staff with drug addiction expertise' as the reason they cannot treat patients
    • No international patient services specific to addiction treatment; language barriers prevent access to services requiring Korean proficiency
    • Less than 2% of drug offenders participated in specialized addiction treatment in 2021, reflecting both limited capacity and social stigma
    • No addiction-specific international accreditation (JCI-accredited facilities are general hospitals, not addiction treatment centers)

    Read the full South Korea report →

Reading the field

What separates a good programme from a dangerous one

Every country above is graded against this published scale — the same 1–5 rubric for residential rehab quality, top to bottom. How we score →

  1. 5/5 Excellent

    Multiple internationally accredited residential facilities (5+ with JCI/CARF or equivalent). Comprehensive evidence-based treatment programs with qualified, multilingual clinical staff. Published outcome data showing strong success rates (>60% long-term sobriety). Robust international patient support services. Strong regulatory oversight and transparent quality reporting. Specialized programs for multiple addiction types.

  2. 4/5 Good

    Several quality residential facilities (3-4 accredited) with evidence-based programs and qualified staff. Good outcome tracking with moderate success rates (40-60%). Adequate international patient services with some language support. Clear regulatory framework with regular oversight. Some specialized addiction programs available.

  3. 3/5 Moderate

    Basic residential rehabilitation services available with some accredited facilities (1-2). Standard treatment approaches implemented with adequately trained staff. Limited outcome data available but facilities operate safely. Basic international patient accommodation. Government oversight present but potentially inconsistent. Generic addiction treatment without extensive specialization.

  4. 2/5 Poor

    Few residential facilities available, minimal or questionable accreditation. Limited evidence-based treatment approaches, potentially underqualified staff. No reliable outcome data or concerning success rates. Minimal support for international patients. Weak regulatory oversight or compliance issues. Very limited treatment options.

  5. 1/5 Very Poor / Unavailable

    Virtually no quality residential addiction treatment available. Lack of accreditation or regulatory oversight. Unqualified staff or concerning treatment methods. No international patient services. Significant safety or quality concerns. Treatment approaches may be ineffective or potentially harmful.

The reports

The full country reports under this lens

Each destination we have assessed has a full, cited report — the detailed analysis behind its score. The verdict is free; the report is the depth.

Clinics & providers

The clinics our research names

Named hospitals, clinics and centres cited across these findings — each carrying the specialties our reports record. Follow one to the reports behind it.

References

The sources behind these assessments

The distinct sources cited across these published reports — every finding carries its own citations; this is the union, each linking back to the reports that lean on it.

  1. Untitled source accreditedrehabs.com/rehab/monte-fenix-spanish-delivered-treatment Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Mexico
  2. Untitled source acibademinternational.com/reconstructive-plastic-surgery-in-turkey-acibadems-approach Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Turkey
  3. Untitled source americanaddictioncenters.org/rehab-guide/success-rates-and-statistics Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Turkey, Residential Rehab Quality in United States
  4. Untitled source anthropology.ucsd.edu/people/faculty/faculty-profiles/Rafful,-Medina,-Zuniga,-Jenkins,-Rangel,-Strathdee,-Davidson-2019--Somebody-Gonna-Be-Hurt-Involuntary-Drug-Treatment-Mexico-Med-Anth-.pdf Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Mexico
  5. Untitled source bajarehab.com Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Mexico
  6. Untitled source bajarehab.com/blog/rehab-in-mexico Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Mexico
  7. Untitled source bi-maristan.com/en/psychiatry/addiction-treatment-in-turkey Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Turkey
  8. Untitled source bi-maristan.com/en/psychiatry/addiction-treatment/drug-addiction-treatment Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Turkey
  9. Untitled source borgenproject.org/drug-rehabilitation-in-brazil Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Brazil
  10. Untitled source carf.org/provider/centro-de-integracion-para-adictos-y-familiares-a-c-monte-fenix-328210 Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Mexico
  11. Untitled source curevalue.org/content/best-countries-for-affordable-and-effective-addiction-treatment Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Mexico
  12. Untitled source dararehab.com/drug-alcohol-rehab Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in South Korea
  13. Untitled source dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/geneltip/issue/80427/1212114 Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Turkey
  14. Untitled source en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission_on_Accreditation_of_Rehabilitation_Facilities Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Mexico
  15. Untitled source en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_Healthcare_Act,_2017 Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in India
  16. Untitled source erenkoyruhsinireah.saglik.gov.tr/EN,369357/alcohol-and-drug-addiction-research-treatment-and-education-center-amatem.html Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Turkey
  17. Untitled source gun.av.tr/insights/guides/healthcare-regulation-2024-in-turkey Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Turkey
  18. Untitled source hackskorea.com/mental-health-korea-foreigners Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in South Korea
  19. Untitled source harprehab.com/locations/korea/en Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in South Korea
  20. Untitled source healingjourney.travel/comprehensive-guide-to-addiction-treatment-in-turkey-for-international-patients Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Turkey
  21. Untitled source healthyturkiye.com/drug-addiction-treatment-turkey Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Turkey
  22. Untitled source humsci.stanford.edu/feature/survival-success-mexico-citys-underground-rehab-centers Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Mexico
  23. Untitled source iclg.com/practice-areas/drug-and-medical-device-litigation/turkey Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in Turkey
  24. Untitled source ijme.in/articles/addiction-treatment-in-india-legal-ethical-and-professional-concerns-reported-in-the-media/?galley=html Cited in Residential Rehab Quality in India

Explore the source archive →

In plain language

Start exploring the knowledge base

The field's shorthand our reports use, sized by how often it comes up. Follow any term to its full entry and the reports that use it.

For readers weighing this decision

Ways to read the evidence

The verdict is always free. A membership opens the full analysis and every cited source — this specialty, the whole library, or everything for good.

  • One specialty · annual

    Mental Health & Addiction

    $49.00 / year

    $49.00/year

    Every report in this specialty — full analysis and every cited source — as each is published.

    Take this specialty

  • Full library · annual

    The whole library

    $199.00 / year

    $199.00/year

    The complete evidence behind every finding in every specialty, while your decision is live.

    Take the full library
  • Most readers

    Lifetime · one payment

    Everything, for good

    $499.00 once

    $499.00 (one-time)

    Every finding we publish today and hereafter — no renewal, no expiry. The tier we point most readers to.

    Take lifetime access

Prefer to pay per report? A single report is $29.00, yours to keep — browse the reports. The verdict is always free.

Where to go from here · Residential Rehab Quality

no scope is a dead end — step up to the specialty, drill into a factor, or pivot across to a country or a comparison