Up the specialty
Zoom out to Therapeutic Interventions
- All of Therapeutic InterventionsSpecialty
An Independent Reference on Medical Travel Abroad · Reader-Funded
Epidaurus · Treatment Guide · Therapeutic Interventions
Going abroad for —
Evidence-based stem cell and bone marrow transplant for hematologic conditions
The country comparison
The destinations ranked high→low under this lens — each with the reasoning behind its score, the cited evidence one click down, and its full report. The verdict is free; the report is the depth.
Reading the field
Every country above is graded against this published scale — the same 1–5 rubric for stem cell transplant quality, top to bottom. How we score →
Multiple FACT/JACIE accredited centers with >100 annual transplants each, published 5-year survival rates >70% for standard risk patients, treatment-related mortality <10%, access to international donor registries with <30 day average search time, comprehensive international patient programs with dedicated housing and coordinators, haploidentical and cord blood programs available, outcomes published and benchmarked internationally.
At least one major FACT/JACIE accredited center performing >50 annual transplants, survival rates 60-70%, treatment-related mortality 10-15%, good donor registry access, established international patient services, most transplant modalities available, regular outcome reporting to international databases.
Transplant programs at major medical centers with 20-50 annual procedures, survival rates 50-60%, treatment-related mortality 15-20%, limited donor registry access, basic international patient accommodation, autologous and some allogeneic programs, inconsistent outcome reporting.
Few transplant centers with <20 annual procedures, survival rates 40-50%, high treatment-related mortality >20%, minimal donor matching capabilities, limited support for international patients, primarily autologous transplants only, poor outcome transparency.
No established stem cell transplant programs, or programs with very poor outcomes (survival <40%), no international accreditation, no donor registry access, no accommodation for international patients requiring extended stays, lack of specialized transplant infrastructure.
The reports
Each destination we have assessed has a full, cited report — the detailed analysis behind its score. The verdict is free; the report is the depth.
Clinics & providers
Named hospitals, clinics and centres cited across these findings — each carrying the specialties our reports record. Follow one to the reports behind it.
References
The distinct sources cited across these published reports — every finding carries its own citations; this is the union, each linking back to the reports that lean on it.
In plain language
The field's shorthand our reports use, sized by how often it comes up. Follow any term to its full entry and the reports that use it.
For readers weighing this decision
The verdict is always free. A membership opens the full analysis and every cited source — this specialty, the whole library, or everything for good.
One specialty · annual
$49.00 / year
$49.00/year
Every report in this specialty — full analysis and every cited source — as each is published.
Take this specialtyFull library · annual
$199.00 / year
$199.00/year
The complete evidence behind every finding in every specialty, while your decision is live.
Take the full libraryLifetime · one payment
$499.00 once
$499.00 (one-time)
Every finding we publish today and hereafter — no renewal, no expiry. The tier we point most readers to.
Take lifetime accessPrefer to pay per report? A single report is $29.00, yours to keep — browse the reports. The verdict is always free.
no scope is a dead end — step up to the specialty, drill into a factor, or pivot across to a country or a comparison
Up the specialty
Across by place
Across put it side by side